Home/Legal Resources/Legal Glossary/Special Leave Petition
LEGAL GLOSSARY · LEGAL SYSTEMWhat Is a Special Leave Petition?
The Supreme Court's discretionary doorway — how Article 136 works, what earns admission, and why most petitions don't survive it.
Gyanendra Singh·Advocate·High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
What Does SLP Mean?
A Special Leave Petition (SLP) is a petition under Article 136 of the Constitution asking the Supreme Court to grant special leave to appeal against any judgment, decree, determination, sentence or order of any court or tribunal in India. It exists where ordinary appeal rights end — a residual, discretionary gateway rather than an entitlement.
Granting leave converts the petition into an appeal heard on merits; refusing it ends the matter with finality at that level.
How Wide — and Where It Stops
- Reach spans civil, criminal and revenue matters from any court or tribunal — extraordinary breadth by design.
- Exclusions apply where the Constitution itself bars the route, notably matters from armed-forces tribunals in defined contexts.
- The Court polices its own docket: interlocutory orders, factual disputes and settled-law applications face summary dismissal.
- Discretion means no two outcomes are predictable from filing volume alone — question quality drives everything.
What Actually Earns Admission
- Substantial questions of law: conflicting high-court decisions, first-impression issues, national importance.
- Grave miscarriage of justice: perverse findings ignoring record evidence, jurisdictional excess, natural-justice violations.
- Settled-law defiance: lower courts refusing binding precedent.
- Clean records and precise question-framing separate admitted petitions from dismissed ones more than eloquence ever will.
Timelines, Costs and Outcomes
- Filing ordinarily runs ninety days from the impugned order — shorter windows apply against certain review-stage orders; condonation demands cause covering every day.
- Admission decisions often come at the first listing after notice; interim relief pending admission requires separate urgency grounds.
- Dismissal at leave stage carries no reasoned judgment typically — and creates no precedent.
- Where leave is granted, full hearing follows on framed questions; costs follow events as ordered.
SLPs: Common Questions
1. Is there a right to have my SLP heard on merits?
No — Article 136 is discretion incarnate. The only enforceable entitlement is fair consideration of whether your case deserves leave; the outcome itself is the Court's alone.
2. What happens if my SLP is dismissed?
The impugned order stands operative; dismissal at leave stage carries no reasons and binds nobody beyond you. Review of such dismissal is exceptional — curative petitions remain the theoretical last door.
3. Can I get a stay of the lower-court order while my SLP pends?
Possible but not automatic — urgent interim applications must justify suspension of the operative order independently. Filing an SLP does not pause execution below by itself.
4. Can both sides file cross-SLPs against one judgment?
Yes — connected petitions are commonly heard together, letting the Court reshape the entire outcome matrix rather than patching one side's grievance alone.
5. Does dismissal create precedent against me elsewhere?
Leave-stage dismissal without reasons sets no binding law, though opposing parties cite it persuasively. Merits-stage judgments bind under Article 141 like any other.
6. My matter involves pure facts. Worth filing anyway?
Rarely successful — the Court repeatedly declines re-appreciating concurrent factual findings absent perversity. Find a genuine legal question or reconsider filing altogether.
Weighing an SLP Against Finality?
Honest odds assessment is worth more than hopeful drafting. Get the question-of-law test applied before you commit.
Contact Gyanendra Singh →Disclaimer: This explanation covers special leave petitions in general terms and is not legal advice. Outcomes depend on questions of law and records; consult a qualified advocate about your situation.