Home/Legal Resources/Legal Glossary/Vesting
LEGAL GLOSSARY · STARTUP & FOUNDERSWhat Is Vesting?
Why equity is earned over time rather than owned outright on day one — cliffs, schedules, acceleration and founder reverse-vesting.
Gyanendra Singh·Advocate·High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
What Does Vesting Mean?
Vesting is the schedule over which rights to equity or options become unconditionally yours. Until a tranche vests, the company (or co-founders, through buy-back mechanics) retains the ability to take it back if you leave. The concept protects every stakeholder from the classic startup failure: a founder or early employee departing months in, holding a large permanent slice they never grew into.
Vesting converts equity from a signing gift into an earned position — which is precisely why investors insist on it before wiring money.
Standard Schedules and the Cliff
- The market-standard employee grant: four years total with a one-year cliff, vesting monthly thereafter — a quarter at month twelve, then 1/48th each month.
- Cliff mechanics: nothing vests before the cliff date; crossing it vests the whole accrued backlog at once.
- Departure before the cliff forfeits everything; departure after vests only the elapsed portion.
- Founders commonly accept matching four-year schedules — sometimes backdated for time already served when investors join later rounds.
- Schedules pause or continue through leave periods per plan terms — worth reading before long sabbaticals.
Acceleration: When Vesting Speeds Up
- Single-trigger: full or partial vesting on change of control alone — acquisition closes, everything vests.
- Double-trigger: change of control plus termination without cause within a defined period — the market-preferred balance protecting acquirers' retention goals.
- Investors resist aggressive single-trigger rights because they can complicate acquisitions; founders negotiate them as protection against being acquired out of a job.
Founder Reverse-Vesting Explained
Founders typically hold their shares from incorporation — but investors require reverse vesting: the founder owns the shares subject to the company's right to buy back unvested portions at nominal value on early exit. Functionally identical to option vesting, but structured backwards around already-issued stock, documented through the shareholders' agreement.
A clean three-founder illustration: each holds one-third, all on four-year vesting with one-year cliffs. A co-founder exiting at month eight leaves with zero equity; at month thirty, half. Nobody subsidises a departed colleague's future windfall.
Vesting: Common Questions
1. Why does anyone need a cliff?
The cliff filters short-lived commitments — both sides learn fit without permanent equity consequences. For founders it prevents a month-one departure from locking in a quarter of the company; for employees it mirrors probation logic applied to ownership.
2. I leave two weeks before my cliff. Anything recoverable?
Under standard drafting, no — unvested tranches lapse at termination regardless of proximity. Some plans exercise discretion for near-miss cases; treat that as goodwill, not entitlement, unless your agreement says otherwise.
3. Is double-trigger better than single-trigger for employees?
Different protections. Single-trigger pays out purely on sale; double-trigger requires losing the job post-sale too. Acquirers prefer double-trigger because retained talent stays motivated — which is why market practice has largely converged there.
4. My cofounder wants no vesting since 'we started this together'. Reasonable?
Investors will not fund unvested founder stakes, and experienced counsel advises against them even pre-funding — departures happen earlier than anyone predicts. Backdating credit for work already done is the fair compromise, not abolishing the schedule.
5. Does vested equity disappear if the company fails?
Vesting secures ownership, not value — failed companies return little to common shareholders regardless of vesting status. The schedule governs entitlement; markets govern what entitlements are worth.
6. Can vesting accelerate on hitting performance milestones instead of time?
Milestone-based vesting exists — revenue targets, product launches — mixing incentive with retention. It demands precise metric definitions; ambiguous milestones convert into dispute generators rather than motivators.
Splitting Equity With Cofounders or Hiring Early Talent?
Schedules drafted today prevent tomorrow's resentment. Structure vesting deliberately from day one.
Contact Gyanendra Singh →Disclaimer: This explanation covers vesting in general terms and is not legal advice. Terms vary by agreement and round; consult a qualified advocate about your situation.